NAA report: Online Newspapers’ Response to Google

The NAA (Newspaper Association of America) recently published a very interesting paper titled: "Getting Serious About Search: Online Newspapers’ Response to Google".

The full report is available on their site, but is available only to registered NAA members. Here are a few interesting nuggets relating to Quigo mentioned in a press release we issued yesterday:

"…For these newspapers, contextual affiliate advertising program options were nearly half as numerous as the number of total replies and included J Carte Marketing, ContextWeb, Quigo, Planet Discover, topix.net, Kontera, IndustryBrains’ sponsored links program (in conjunction with Quigo’s keyword program), Burst Media’s AdConductor program and Yahoo! Search Marketing. Among respondents, Quigo was employed separately and also paired with PlanetDiscover, Kontera and IndustryBrains. Quigo easily took the category, having affiliations with half the respondents."

One executive, while interested in exploring opportunities to engage Google, is taking a pragmatic approach:

We use Quigo for one simple reason. Quigo offers a white-label product that we can sell and manage directly the relationships with our customers. We set the terms of our engagement.”

Another board member is running his own internal test with different properties on either Quigo or AdSense to see which one outperforms the other. He explained, “We took this route because we believe it’s very important to own the relationship with our advertisers. By using Google, the relationship is between Google and the advertiser. We value the opportunities to up-sell our current customers and assist them with the best online ad buys in our marketplace.”

As I said in the past: A media company outsourcing its ad sales, is like a restaurant shutting down its kitchen and outsourcing the food part of the business to McDonalds. Nice to see that the newspapers are starting to understand this threat and responding to it before McGoogle eats their business.

Share this post!

Domain parking as a critical web service

No, the title is not a typo. And no – I don’t like domain parking pages[1]. I actually hate them. Unless you make $$’s from parked domains, you probably hate them too. I especially hate how they’re taking over more and more of the natural search engine results, and reducing their quality to absolute rubbish.

So how in the world can the despicable domain parking business be of any value to the web?!

Here’s how –
Domain parkers make $$’s in two ways: 1) They catch web traffic (usually from search engines or typing of mispelled URL’s) to their domains and monetize the hell out of it using Google AdSense or Yahoo’s YPN, and 2) they buy and sell these domains.

It’s #1 that I hate, and #2 that I think is such a critical service to the web community. A lot of companies buy domains these days, but very few sell them. Once a corporate decision is made to buy a bunch of domains for future use, those domains are usually gone from the market forever even if the owner never does actually use them. That’s just the nature of stuff like this in big/medium companies – no one really cares about unused domains, and just the thought of getting consensus and sign-off on selling a domain is daunting.

Domain parkers, on the other hand, keep the domain inventory liquid. That’s what enables many new web companies to establish brands and actually own a decent domain name. Without domain parkers, a majority of the domains would be snatched by faceless corporations “just to be safe” and never ever see the light of real use ever again.

I wish we could get #2 (liquidity in the market) without #1 (spamming of search engines), but I guess that’s the price we all have to pay for this service. I just hope that Matt Cutts & Co at the search engines will find ways to push these shitty pages far down the result list…

[1] No link love in this post… if you don’t know what domain parking is, Washington Post recently had a good article on this subject.

[update: just noticed that Forbes had an article on the subject of parked domains a couple of days ago. via Dan Grossman]

Share this post!

Why eBay will acquire StubHub

Here’s another episode in my “this-is-probably-going-to-make-me-look-stupid” series of predictions. I should really stop this habit… Anyhow:

StubhubI went to the Yankees-Mets game last night. It was sold out with an attendance of 56,205. However, we were able to get four tickets just a few hours before the game started, thanks to StubHub which is a marketplace for buying and selling tickets between people.

The StubHub service is really great – they have a solid feature set, the site is good, information on the events and venues is very good, the ‘Buyer’s Guarantee’ makes you comfortable buying there, etc, etc, etc.

So would eBay acquire StubHub for all the great features and expertise they have developed around person-to-person ticket buying and selling? I bet you eBay doesn’t give a shit about any of that.

What does matter in the world of online person-to-person marketplaces is becoming the de-facto marketplace of choice for buyers and sellers. Once you become that, it’s a very defensible position that’s almost impossible for other marketplaces to win because of a simple law – buyers won’t come to a marketplace that doesn’t have much inventory, and sellers won’t list their inventory in a marketplace that doesn’t have many buyers. This catch-22 is what makes de-facto marketplaces so defensible… even the best feature set in the world from the best known brands can hardly dent this law (ask Amazon and Yahoo, both of which tried launching eBay-clones in the past).

It seems that growingly StubHub, not eBay, is perceived as THE go-to place for buying and selling tickets to events. Once that perception is established, even mighty eBay will find it almost impossible to win back the leadership position in this category (and again – in the marketplace business if you’re not the leader, you’re almost by definition not a player).

eBay cannot afford to cede such a core category to another player, and will not be able to win this battle through R&D, and therefore I predict that once this is realized, eBay will acquire StubHub.

[UPDATE:] 2 for 2

Share this post!