Unicorn thoughts

Valuation ≠ Company’s Value. Some entrepreneurs, and *many* reporters, forget this.

For example: Raising VC money at a $1B+ valuation does not mean the company is worth $1B+

Anytime you read in the news that “X is worth a billion dollars!” because they raised a VC investment – that is basically fake news, perpetrated by reporters that don’t fully understand private financing, and assisted by startups enjoying the hype (“We’re a Unicorn!”)  

Valuation of private companies is merely a way to *temporarily* organize the company’s cap table, until the company’s value is sorted out in the future.

A company’s valuation = its value, in just 2 cases:

  1. When its shares are traded publicly, or –
  2. When the company (or its shares) is acquired for cash.

“Unicorn” investments in private companies many times have less to do with the value of the company’s business or needs, and often are simply a way to park low-interest $$’s in a high-yielding preference/structure.

To the entrepreneurs that raise at a $1B+ valuation: 

  • Congrats & well done!! 
  • Spend every dollar like it’s your last one. 
  • Don’t forget that the correct time to celebrate an investment is after *returning* it to investors, not when taking it.  
Share this post!

Rating VC answers, part II

Fred Wilson just posted about saying “No” to entrepreneurs. Reminded me of a post I wrote a while back rating VC answers from the entrepreneur’s perspective.

As difficult as it is to have someone not share your excitement with your venture, getting a clear ‘No’ is one of the best outcomes of a VC meeting because it lets you move on quickly.

I’m looking forward to getting many clear “No’s” in the near future!… 😉

Share this post!

Rating VC answers

Fred Wilson and Michael Eisenberg write about turning down entrepreneurs from the VC’s perspective. Michael Eisenberg says:

Personally, I find the hardest part of this business is telling an entrepreneur that we will not invest in his/her business…

…When saying “no” I get 2 sinking feelings in my stomach:
1. Is this really the right decision? Am I missing something that could be the next big thing?
2. The second is the horrible feeling you know the entrepreneur has after working hard in the diligence process and realizing that he needs to restart a process with another firm or angels. And, in the worst case, will need to give up his dream.

I thought I’d add an entrepreneur’s perspective on this. Here’s how I would rate the possible responses from a VC on a scale of 1-100:

  1. Yes, we want to invest” – 100
  2. No, we’ll pass on this” – 95
  3. We like the company, lets continue talking” – 2

A few years ago I think I would have ranked this differently, in a way that would fit Michael’s description above much better. Hearing from a VC that they “like the company” and want to continue talking would get us all excited. We hated the VC’s that rejected us because they were stupid morons that didn’t ‘get it’.

But after having pitched to tens of VC’s (and not getting funded by any), I started realizing that getting a straight “No” is 10x more valuable than the time-waster also known as “We like the company”.

As Fred mentioned in his post, it is technically impossible for any VC to invest in all of the companies they like. This means that mathematically, any entrepreneur pitching VC’s will *not* get funded by many more VC’s than those that will fund him/her.

Once you understand that, getting a straightforward “No” from a VC actually becomes a desirable answer, because it lets you move on in a more rapid way to meet that one VC in the mathematical equation that will fund you.

Oh, and by the way – Michael Eisenberg, while at Israel Seed, is one of those many VC’s I had the pleasure of pitching Quigo to, and I have to admit that I noticed none of the inner struggles he described in his post…. Good poker face?…

Share this post!