What business are you in?

I recently watched Michael Eisner’s show on CNBC (called ‘Conversations’, I think) in which he hosted Mark Cuban.

Mark had one of the best entrepreneurial sentences I’ve ever heard:

When I bought the Mavericks, everyone in the organization thought we were in the business of basketball. But we aren’t. We’re in the business of “Honey, what do you want to do tonight?”

Bingo!!

Photo credit: JD Lasica (link below)

It’s so easy to describe what business *you* think you’re in. The trick is to define the business *your customers* see you in. It’s not about what your product does, or which cool features it has. It’s all about understanding which piece of attention of your customers you’re fighting for, and who are the others trying to get that same slice of attention.

This has got to be the #1 mistake entrepreneurs make (and I’m speaking from personal experience…) – falling in love with their product/features and believing that the product is the business they’re in. This must be the silent killer of startups because it’s such a huge mistake that’s so easy to go unnoticeable…

Cuban, as usual, nails it.

{Image CC – JD Lasica. Thanks!}

Share this post!

Google, Yahoo and stock prices

I’m pretty much clueless about the stock market (unless watching Jim Cramer throw around chairs counts for anything). I guess that stuff simply skipped my DNA. So if the following sounds to you like a 2nd grader asking stupid stock questions, you are absolutely right…:

With all the Google stock mania going on, alongside the poo-pooing of Yahoo as being a terrible investment, I’m mystified about one thing:

Isn’t stock investing all about the future financial growth of the company?

Google is an incredible company, no doubt about it. Their revenues are beyond staggering. One of the main reasons their numbers are so great is that they figured out how to monetize a search query and optimized and optimized and optimized. And optimized.

They’ve done such an amazing job with optimizing revenue-per-query, that I wonder if there are any other big optimization tricks up their sleeve. If not, it seems inevitable that revenue-per-query will flatten or at least its growth rate will drop sharply. When that happens, overall *revenue* growth will result from overall *query* growth. This can come from 2 sources: New internet users, and/or converting users over from competition. Both ain’t exciting growth prospects. [1]

Yahoo on the other hand has done a terrible job at monetizing their search queries so far. Their ads were too long, the placement was by bid price and not by overall yield, the relevancy was questionable, etc, etc, etc.

But that’s all part of the past. At this point it seems like Yahoo has all the optimization growth in front of it, while Google is basically done with most of its per-query optimization growth. With Yahoo’s new Panama system being soft-launched these days, it seems like they’re focusing exactly on squeezing the hell out of each query’s revenue potential.

So, if stocks are all about the *future* financial growth prospects of a company – Is it terribly stupid to go long on Yahoo, and short Google? I’m surely missing something that the rest of the market is seeing.

[1] Of course YouTube might start generating gobbles of money, etc. That might be. But today Google is basically a 1-trick revenue pony called AdWords (AdSense is mostly a money wash because of the low margins Google is operating it on).

Share this post!